The first three episodes of Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan’s Netflix documentary “Harry
As “TMZ” reports, the film location is a house worth 33 million dollars, which is not far from Meghan and Harry’s estate. The news caused criticism on social media. Meghan and Harry would want to splurge, so the tenor. They played something for their fans, some users suspected.
In fact, the news that the two didn’t film part of the documentary at home doesn’t really come as a surprise. It is not uncommon for locations to be sought for this type of filming. Even if it’s personal documentation. It is quite possible that the two simply did not want to make so many rooms available in their own home. In the end, this is only a background in the image section.
But not only the fact that the luxury property was not Harry and Meghan’s causes anger. Because the film location previously belonged to a man whose history should not actually be compatible with Prince Harry’s values.
Mark Schulhof is the name of the man who, according to the Daily Mail, is accused of inventing a wounded Afghanistan veteran with his company Quadriga Arts to raise money for the Disabled Veterans National Foundation charity. Money that was then paid to him himself. Quadriga Arts billed $15.6 million in 2008, but the charity only raised $10.1 million. The organization went into debt. In 2014, the New York City Attorney’s Office launched an investigation and concluded that Schulhof’s company should pay $24.6 million to the charity, among other things.
Prince Harry, who campaigns for wounded veterans with his Invictus Games and himself served in the Afghan war, may not like this information about the homeowner. It is questionable, however, whether the son of King Charles III. even knew in whose former estate he was filming. It is extremely unlikely that the protagonists of a Netflix production would themselves be used as location scouts.
Those: “TMZ” / “Daily Mail”
also read
“Time” title: Meghan wears jewelry worth over 300,000 euros – and each part has a special meaning
Princess Diana’s flower girl was on Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘pedo island’
Misogyny #1? Who else Piers Morgan clashed with besides Meghan
