The former monastery garden in Percha is not for the time being restored. City architect, Stephan Weinl earned for his proposal in the Committee, although the recognition, but in view of the tax losses due to the Corona-crisis appeared to the city councils far-fetched the idea currently.
Percha Nice it would be, but it is currently inconceivable: The building Committee has rehabilitate a proposal from the administration, parts of the former monastery garden in Percha, and to make a small recreation area, with a clear majority rejected. The cost of at least 56 000 Euro in the next two years appeared the city councils, in addition to the BMS in light of the foreseeable financial problems due to the Corona-crisis out of the question. From the table, the idea is not.
15 years Ago, the city had acquired the area to the South of the present-day Maltese congregation of St. Joseph on the way to Perchaer Marie grotto of the St. Joseph’s congregation Ursberg. It is around 11 000 square meters to the South of the Harkirchner street, also the building part of it. A part of the surface of the former monastery garden. There are also stairs, everything was wild at the time something. By 2017, the congregation took over the care, the terrace gardens should be placed after the definition in 2017 again. A concept was given in order, since January, a grubbing permit. This by the office for nutrition, agriculture and forestry because of the home, however, to the condition that the area must be publicly accessible. The wanted to implement a city architect, Stephan Weinl now.
in Order to make the area a Park, some Work is required – roden, rhizomes eliminate the walls and stairs cut out and mending, Creating flower beds, restore the paths and handrails and the like, Placement of benches. Everything in itself is no big deal, what is the cost of 48 000 Euro in this year and 8000 in the next year. “A beautiful local recreation area” would be the result, said Weinl in the Committee and on delivery. The planting work should start in the autumn; some of it is already cut-free, such as the path to Mary’s grotto.
Ludwig jäger Huber (CSU), the project “wonderful” and would not support it immediately – if the Corona pandemic would be. Weinl would not have submitted to the project, he would have been in a budget meeting, criticized hunter Huber: “We don’t have the money. We should move it until we get better.“ The city, currently live on credit, projects such as this are not just about loans to Finance argued, the CSU Council. And a Park seemed to him not worth it. Mayor Patrick Janik not, also how to recognize. Dr. Franz Sengl (Green) brought a business sponsorship into the game, such as the savings Bank. Such ideas should be examined in greater detail.
Eva John (BMS), however, considers a de facto investment barrier for these projects is wrong. In vain she sought to have the Work from the depot run, as far as possible. The Corona-crisis should not lead to a total refusal, after all, the companies are in need of jobs in order to pay back business tax. You are urged to consider each case individually: “An investment due to Corona, our task will lock not just. The Federal government and the country ahead of us.“ Janik stressed, you have in the budget a deficit on current expenditures (administrative budget), that would only cover per credit. After the last Stand of the budget deliberations of the city is missing the nine million euros, in the first round of the Corona-crisis, there were nearly four. Alone in the income and business tax the city expects to have five million euros less revenue than initially planned.
With ten against two voices (John and Joseph Pfister, both BMS) reset the construction of the Plan in the end. Unanimously, the Committee, funding, and other funding advocated to explore the possibilities.
