“do Why the hell are five mothers to turn to their own Porn?” The question of the Sex-expert, Paula Lambert to entry in the satellite.1-documentary with the striking name of “mother make Porno” has made the audience afterwards. Five mothers of the Hardcore porn industry said, according to the station’s on-air struggle – by you wanted to produce a pedagogically valuable sex.
The documentary started with a lurid voice from the Off announced with relish, “a journey into the deepest pornographic abyss”. Adolescents were about one and a half minutes of airtime in Interviews, phrases like: “How the hell two fists to fit in a rectum?” Uncommented, they used scene terms like “Bukkake” or “Gangbang”.
“The only rumgereicht yet!”
And in the Perspective on the following transmission time, showed the terrified faces of the mothers who watched, what you can find freely available on the net. They beat the hands of stunned in front of his face, looked away with tears in their eyes, than, for example, a young woman to a sex object out of ten men or a rape scene was re-enacted. “The puke in a bowl!” “The is tied!” “The only rumgereicht yet!”, said one of the mothers.
Only Between their horrified faces partly pixelated) scenes of the repulsive porn staccato were (like a in-between cut. And also the cries of the woman were heard. Was that really necessary? The enlightenment served?
“What is Aesthetic”
The mothers were unanimous: “We have to do something about it.” There is no doubt that children and young people always come easier via the Internet and social media, to pornographic content, this in messenger services such as Whatsapp are increasingly replacing and also increasingly run the risk to encounter violence and other disturbing images.
“What company” sounds exactly right. Sat.1 and his five mothers who do not know each other before all, and children between the ages of 4 and 21 years, came to the idiosyncratic idea, to make “a proper movie”, i.e. Porn. Have you wanted to take, mind you – as a Producer, protagonists well – “what is Aesthetic, Educational, Beautiful”. A Film that the youth will show how it could go.
Grinning next to the naked man
However, in their Research, the five women showed for the first time all of the things they don’t want. Two mothers, the erotic fair Venus in Berlin, visited not understand why a gentleman should be here to run naked through the area, then posed, but smiling for the camera right next to him.
The documentary has always had a credibility problem. On the one hand, was the professional porn shoot properly for a long time (back to the basics pixelated) with the satellite.1-camera on it, and with the malice of the main cast, it did not work with the height right, not saved. Then two mothers echauffierten but again, loudly, when it came to the topic of BDSM, and Bondage lifestyle in the mutual agreement. By a Dominatrix, it was then for the camera with ropes pack.
When you visit a Sexologist this noted, the question of a “enlightenment porn” was: “this Is for the people not to a little charm?” A mother insured quickly: “The Wicked, Forbidden must stay inside.” So much for what “Nice Enlightenment”.
“What are you up to?”
media researchers, Jo Groebel sees the approach of the documentary critical: “the question is: What’s up with that? What is the purpose of that? Is that supposed to be a scouting show or an entertainment show? About the background of the porn industry, there are excellent documentaries that illuminate the shadow side is better than this,“ said he to FOCUS Online.
Groebel takes satellite.1 his enlightenment not from the project: “It is primarily entertainment, and it’s just a bit of clarification. The documentary is technically done in a professional manner. Under the label of enlightenment is introduced to a voyeuristic component. And the Cliffhanger is, of course, that the audience also wants to know how the Porn you want to look.“ SAT.1/SAT.1 / Marvin The five protagonist cooking the inside of the “mothers Porno” (v. l.) make: Britta, Karina, Miriam, Jasmine, Bianca,
stressed The question of enlightenment
Groebel: “There are definitely scenes that are borderline. The porn, albeit pixelated, are already violent. That’s always been the Trick of the contextualization: It shows the horrified faces of the mothers, and then you can send in the end very much, even more dramatic,.“
in His view, the education effect is due to the documentary low. And: “Who is to be ever solved? Who the recipients are? The remains unclear.“ The mothers were good over there, some of it will be presented “easy breezy”. “But the question remains for me whether the need to broadcast everything to be this time of the day,” added the media scientists.
“The poor children”
just at this point, many viewers of the documentary were disturbed. “The poor children, criticized the in your vacation time now, in the evening, the TV program is switched, and the have seen,” a User with Facebook. “Think it’s a joke, so what show 20:15, where many of the children look, will Sat.1 from my TV list to delete“, other. “Something like that can you send it after midnight, found the impossible!” scolded a Userin.
Sat.1 the documentary episodes of the volunteers had submitted to self-control TV (FSF) for review and approval for a charisma of 20 PM, a spokeswoman said on request by FOCUS Online. This release was made.
“Very controversial” discussion
According to the FSF has been discussed in the Prüfausschüssen about it, however, is “very controversial”. “Two of the procedures – only in the calling – from the age of 12 to be released, so a charisma of 20 is possible, one Episode received the release from 16 years of age and can be in the late evening from 22 clock shown,” said a spokeswoman on request by FOCUS Online. With this Episode the result of the mothers-porn is “Vanilla X” – this refers to the satellite.1 next Wednesday (29.7.) in excerpts of part 2 of the documentary from 22.25 at shows.
The FSF spokeswoman said, for a release from 16 years of the “density image plane with images of standard porn, and the fact that the porn industry will not be commented on critically speaking”. Only older Teens could classify pornography as a mere facet of sexuality is appropriate. For a share 12 years of age speak, that is clearly not the objective of the enlightenment and the call for conversation between the generations is the focus of the show. The illustrations are alienated or from the distance shown.
“Against this Background, the majority of auditors believed that the inside and the auditor in the case of episodes 1 and 2 from 12-Year-old to put the scenes with sexual content in the context described and classified,” she said. In part 3, Porn of moms, is the elucidation of character, in spite of the comments of the mothers lower. This part has been approved by the examiners, therefore, unanimously, from the age of 16.
The topic is likely to be in the FSF and otherwise more actively discussed. Already on Thursday two members of the audience had received complaints about the broadcast at the FSF. More News from the world of culture and entertainment
- Royals in the News Ticker
- celebrity News
- music News in the Ticker
- The rest of the wedding in the News Ticker
“There’s no rules”: Mallorca-Star appalled by the Dutch section at the ball man FOCUS Online “There are no rules”: Majorca-Star appalled by the Dutch section at the ball man
maa
