for several years was told the error on the lock to a godsvognstype, in an accident in January killed eight life.
The error in the lock to a godsvognstype, according to the Accident investigation board was the prime cause of a fatal accident on the great belt Bridge 2. January has proven to be well known for several years.
It appears by Havarikommissionens studies after the accident that claimed the lives of eight people.
Here it emerged that employees in Carlsberg, who received the trailer, has told employees in DB Cargo, which was to carry the that The trailers are not always sat locked in place, although it immediately looked like this.
According to the Accident investigation board was sættevognstraileren on a freight train is not locked proper real and could, therefore, blow of the train, which led to the accident on the great belt.
Bo Haaning, who has been at the forefront of Havarikommissionens work, refuse to notify, when The staff first told that the carts might need to be repaired.
– Prior to January of this year, there was no one who dreamed about that it was dangerous. It is not something that has happened in Europe ever, he says:
– They (The employees) are told that they sometimes registered that there was a defective lock. It, and told the check. They had done so in several years. It was not always the case that it was repaired.
He stresses that there should be a special set of circumstances, including a very special in the wind, before it created a dangerous situation.
According to Bo Haaning com reviews “more places”. Therefore, the spread of a perception that it was not a dangerous error in the lock.
the mistake did, that the trailers could be put on a wagon and apparently locked in place in the lock, which sits in a godsvogns stool, although this is not physical was the case.
the Error occurred according to the Aib, because of lack of maintenance.
Bo Haaning refuses to tell, when Carlsberg’s employees for the first time reporting an error on the lock.
however, He says that it is unclear whether the maintenance has ever been sufficient, and therefore employees will not necessarily have detected any change.
– it Is likely that it (the lack of maintenance, ed.) is going on, since they are put into operation in 2008? – Yes, says Bo Haaning.
the Accident investigation board is not authorized to appoint, who is responsible for the accident 2. January.
After Havarikommissionens work supervision, in this case, the Housing, Construction and public transport, and The Police now going to investigate whether there is a violated some criminal law.
Head of unit Christian Vesterager from the agency announces that it asks the DB Cargo account for who knew what.
the Accident investigation board has as one of the four recommendations that it should be put in the system, how such knowledge among employees to come forward to the appropriate security management of the DB Cargo.
/ritzau/
