This was decided by the social court of Berlin-Brandenburg. In the present case, the Jobcenter had refused, after the move, a 1997-born Performance the entire rent of the new accommodation person receiving this benefit apply to. The justification of the authority: The relocation had not been expressly approved. The job centre paid as a result of his refusal to continue the old rent.
Hartz IV-recipient pulls against the Jobcenter to court
The new apartment was slightly larger than the old one and cost on a monthly basis 349,14 Euro. The rent for the previous apartment was located in 319,00 Euro. The Jobcenter refused to accept the monthly costs of 30,14 euros for the new home.
Also interesting: Hartz IV-recipient complains to Corona-masks-grant – court-rejects
Then, the Hartz-IV-the person receiving this benefit moved to the front of the social court in Frankfurt (Oder). They complained against the Authorities with the justification, the move to 1. December 2016 was based on practical considerations. The new flat was located close to the station and bring your a-Minute time savings of one hour. The Plaintiff led a second Argument to the field: The new home was mold-free, in contrast to the previous accommodation.
first instance verdict in favor of the applicant, the Jobcenter is in Revision
The social court of Frankfurt (Oder) gave the right of the Hartz-IV-the person receiving this benefit. For the change of the only plausible reasons must be available – as long as the new dwelling is not connected to unreasonable costs (Az.: S 40 AS 1945/17). (Display)
are you looking for your dream job?
Here, you will find it!
In particular, did the judge: the rent for The new apartment is not to exceed the responsibility of the job centre in full because of the reasonable housing costs in a Hartz-IV-reference. Both of the applicant’s stated reasons are plausible – both the travel time savings and the risk of Mould growth can be Avoided.
regional social court of Berlin-Brandenburg rejects the Revision from
The job center accepted the judge’s decision and the court of Berlin-Brandenburg, went in appeal before the country’s social security system. However, the judge made short process and rejected the complaint as unfounded (L19 AS 2352/19). A Revision has not been approved. Thus, the judgment is final.
Declaration: Hartz IV recipients have, in principle, be entitled to the payment of unemployment benefit II in the amount of the standard rate. The Assumption of the costs for accommodation and heating (KdU) from the Jobcenter is yet to come. At these costs, many factors play a role – for example, whether it is a One-person or Multi – person household, the age of the Pensioner or the amount of the rent. Unemployed? These are 10 things you need to know, Our PDF guide explains how you can apply for money and what else you need to know, if you become unemployed.To the PDF guide
“That Germany thinks”: the Hartz IV program or toil – worth it Work in Germany? FOCUS Online, “That Germany thinks”: the Hartz IV program or toil – worth it Work in Germany?
The FOCUS of Online In the stock market expert Bernecker: “Just the Dummies in the stock market get rich” FOCUS Online stock market expert Bernecker: “Just the Dummies on the stock market are rich”
mbe
