so far there appears to be no support for boligministers proposals to curb bolighajer.
It may indicate that the housing minister Kaare Dybvad (S) must go through a long haul to find a majority for an intervention against bolighajer, after he presented his proposal Wednesday before a meeting among the parties.
Yet there is no boligordførere, that is to say, whether they support the proposals, as the minister has come up with in an attempt to stem the tide of foreign private equity funds as Blackstone, which renovates apartments and screws price significantly in the weather.
The Radical will first have to answer a number of questions, because any action can have an effect on the market, where the fear is that the price of housing cooperatives indirectly could be affected.
– He can not be sure of his majority yet. It should not go beyond andelsbolighaverne, so I would like to be with for a surgical intervention in the face of the black sheep, says boligordfører Jens Rohde (R).
Nor the Left, Danish people’s Party is provisionally in favour of the minister’s proposal. Enhedslisten and SF wants to abolish paragraph 5 paragraph. 2 in boligreguleringsloven, as the whole matter has as its starting point.
It is the that lets investors buy properties, refurbish them and put the price significantly in the weather. It was introduced in 1996 for, among other things, to do something about the big cities aging houses.
In Copenhagen there was, for example, not bath and toilet in many occasions, but it has the paragraph been with to ensure.
the Minister proposes a number of things.
To go ten years from the purchase of the property to the landlord can raise the rent after the paragraph, that there is a requirement for a minimum of label C at D today, to freeze the valuarvurderinger and to remove the word “significant” from the paragraph in which it appears, that the rent does not significantly exceed the lejedes value.
The Radicals have a variety of anchor in relation to the proposal.
– It is important to be flexible in energiklassificering, so you go step by step up instead of taking a big jump. Secondly, I doubt that it is legal according to european law, and the Fsa, when it freezes the valuarvurderingerne.
– thirdly, it is a question whether the ten-year waiting period is too violent, compared to the loss of value there will be for rental and cooperative housing, ” says Jens Rohde.
/ritzau/
