Philipp Studhalter, President of FC Luzern
“The Clubs want games, no Spirit, because not only the frame would be sad, but also a big financial loss would be created. We would lack would expect that us would be the cost of a single mind game in their own stadium, around 250’000 Swiss francs: The ticketing revenue of around 150’000, at the same time, we need to invest for the organization, the safety, the light, and another about 100’000 Swiss francs.
“It would be reasonable to assume that a spirit, a large number of game in spite of everything, Fans would gather in front of the stadium”Philipp Studhalter
provides in Addition, the question is: Would the grant of Canton a permit? It would be reasonable to assume that a spirit, a large number of game in spite of everything, Fans would gather in front of the stadium.”
Vanya abomination, CEO of Young Boys
“the spirit of the games we consider to be a bad Option, to the extent that we are satisfied with the decision. In spite of the disruption, we have rooms in the design of the game plan is still small, but it will gradually narrow. Anything other than a turn to the Uefa to allow game days at the same time, with matches of the Champions League, would I as inappropriate. We don’t want to deal with it, what are the consequences of mind games for us. It is clear that in our terms and conditions the festival is not written that we are liable, should parts fail for reasons of force majeure or in front of empty stands discharged must be.”
Matthias Hüppi, President of the FC St. Gallen
“It was of great importance to us, to the spirit of the games to come around – from a sporting and economic Considerations. We now have two home games against FC Zurich and Thun unsubscribe. Tend to be the Kybunpark would have been sold out for next Saturday. In addition, it runs in the Hospitality area to be excellent. And it is simply this: Our audience is for us an extremely important back. To us, it may not be consequently at all regardless of how many spectators come to the stadium. Because we don’t have a patron to fill financial holes.
as Long as the possibilities with the new game data is there, you have to horseback riding necessarily on this path, with all Conviction. The League has done very good preparatory work and show how the championship operation can still cope. Should aggravate the Situation and the operation cannot be recorded during a longer period of time, we need to assess the new. There are scenarios on which we have absolutely no control.
“An epidemic of insurance, we have not completed, because the cost would be too high.”Matthias Hüppi
An epidemic of insurance, we have not completed, because the cost would be too high. Tickets are around for the Match against the FCZ purchased, retain their validity. However, the money those who are prevented from the new game date and not to the stadium can, according to the terms and conditions shall not be refunded.”
Markus Lüthi, President of FC Thun
“We are delighted that the mind games were able to be provisionally avoided. We are dependent on the money of spectators. That’s why I think the solution we have found, for the best. Not only for us but for all Clubs. And, depending on the development of the Situation, we need to discuss again how to go on.”
Christian Constantin, President of FC Sion
“It is certainly the most sensible decision, and in the sense of the football . The Clubs are companies, they depend on the revenues. And games without an audience are just sad. However, if after the 4. April can not be played, we have a Problem. Then I see hardly a Chance to play in the championship through to the end.”
third mid – term of the Tamedia football-Podcast
The show is listening to on Spotify, with Apple’s Podcasts or directly here: Here you will find all the episodes in one place.
Created: 03.03.2020, 07:12 PM
