The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has recently called upon the National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) to provide a detailed response regarding the construction of a highway that spans across a pond in south-west Delhi. This issue was brought to light in 2024 when the tribunal took notice of a report published by The Times of India, which highlighted NHAI’s development of the Urban Extension Road-II over a pond located in Goyla Khurd village in Delhi’s South West district. The pond in question was part of a larger list of over 1,000 ponds designated for protection, making this a matter of significant environmental concern.
In response to the allegations, the tribunal criticized NHAI for submitting vague and cryptic statements in the past. Additionally, the vice-chairperson of the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the entity responsible for the land where the pond is situated, has been summoned to participate in the upcoming hearing. NHAI had previously attempted to shift the blame onto DDA, claiming that it had adhered to all regulations. However, the pond was officially recognized and safeguarded by Delhi state’s wetland authority, contradicting NHAI’s actions.
“The allegation is that NHAI has built the Urban Extension Road-II over the pond in Goyla Khurd village, which is part of a long list of protected ponds. The Delhi Pollution Control Committee’s response validates the claim that NHAI constructed the highway over the pond, which was transferred from DDA to NHAI,” the tribunal stated. Despite multiple reminders, DDA has yet to provide a response, leading the NGT to summon the vice-chairman to participate in the proceedings and assist the tribunal.
As the situation unfolds, it becomes evident that NHAI’s previous responses have been lacking in detail, prompting the NGT to demand a comprehensive reply within a specified timeframe. The tribunal emphasized that NHAI’s compliance with the EIA Notification, 2006, does not absolve them of responsibility in this matter. In light of recent developments, the Ministry of Environment has placed the onus on the state to address this environmental issue promptly.
Expert Insights on Environmental Impact
To gain a deeper understanding of the potential environmental repercussions of constructing infrastructure over protected water bodies, we consulted with Dr. Maya Singh, an environmental scientist specializing in wetland conservation. Dr. Singh emphasized the vital role that ponds and wetlands play in maintaining ecological balance and highlighted the need for stringent regulations to safeguard these fragile ecosystems.
“By encroaching upon protected ponds, we risk disrupting delicate ecosystems that support a diverse range of plant and animal species. Wetlands act as natural filters, purifying water and providing essential habitats for wildlife. It is crucial that authorities prioritize the conservation of such areas to prevent irreversible damage to our environment,” Dr. Singh explained.
Community Concerns and Advocacy Efforts
Local residents in Goyla Khurd village have expressed their dismay over the construction of the highway over the pond, citing the loss of a vital water source and the potential environmental consequences. Advocacy groups and environmental activists have rallied around the cause, calling for greater accountability from NHAI and DDA in preserving the region’s natural heritage.
Rajesh Sharma, a long-time resident of the village, shared his concerns about the impact of the highway on the community. “The pond was not just a source of water for us but also a place of cultural significance. Its destruction has left us feeling disconnected from our roots and worried about the future of our environment,” Sharma lamented.
As the legal proceedings continue and stakeholders weigh in on the matter, it is evident that the protection of natural resources and ecosystems remains a pressing priority. The outcome of this case will not only shape future infrastructure development but also set a precedent for upholding environmental conservation efforts nationwide.
