In a recent development that has sent shockwaves through the law enforcement community, Deputy Superintendent of Police Kanakalakshmi of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) has been indicted in connection with the tragic suicide of advocate Jeeva, a key figure in the Bhovi Corporation Scam case. The investigation report, meticulously compiled by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) appointed by the High Court, has shed light on the alleged mishandling of the case by Kanakalakshmi, leading to the untimely demise of the accused advocate.
Uncovering the Truth: SIT Report and High Court Response
The SIT, consisting of seasoned investigators such as CBI SP Vinayak Verma and DCPs Hakay Akshay Machindra and Nisha James, undertook a thorough examination of the circumstances surrounding Jeeva’s death. Their report, submitted to the High Court, was met with praise for the team’s dedication and diligence in carrying out a fair and impartial investigation. However, the High Court was quick to clarify that this acknowledgment did not imply an endorsement of the investigation’s validity, but rather a commendation for the procedural aspects of the inquiry.
The tragic events leading up to Jeeva’s suicide, as detailed in her poignant 13-page note, paint a harrowing picture of alleged misconduct and abuse of power by Kanakalakshmi. The deceased advocate accused the CID officer of subjecting her to degrading treatment during interrogation, mental harassment, and extortion of a hefty bribe. Despite Jeeva’s desperate plea for justice, as evidenced by a complaint lodged with the High Court mere days before her death, her cries fell on deaf ears until it was too late.
Unraveling the Investigation: Allegations and Arrest
The subsequent investigation by the SIT uncovered troubling discrepancies in the handling of the case by Kanakalakshmi. While most of the accusations leveled against the officer in Jeeva’s note were found to have merit, allegations of corruption remained unproven. Shockingly, critical evidence such as CCTV footage and documentation crucial to the investigation were either tampered with or missing altogether, in direct violation of a High Court directive.
According to sources close to the investigation, Kanakalakshmi’s actions in falsifying records and manipulating evidence were key factors in her eventual arrest by the SIT in March. As the team awaits official sanction from the State government to proceed with filing a chargesheet against the accused officer, questions linger about the systemic failures that allowed such misconduct to occur unchecked.
As the story continues to unfold, it serves as a sobering reminder of the immense responsibility borne by those entrusted with upholding the law and seeking justice. The tragic fate of advocate Jeeva stands as a stark warning against the abuse of power and a call to action for accountability within our justice system. As the wheels of justice slowly turn, the echoes of her untold story reverberate through the corridors of power, demanding answers and accountability from those sworn to protect and serve.
