Regardless of whether or not delicate white, bitter, with hazelnuts or simply sweet: chocolate has for many people as a sinful Treat, a high priority. The handle into the candy shelf takes place mostly according to the motto: What you know, also ends up in the shopping cart. However, in the shelf of so many delicious and equally cheap chocolate Alternative is hidden, as in the Test of Stiftung Warentest shows. The summer sale has begun!
With coupons for anyone
The biggest coupon selection on the Internet!
The experts examined a total chocolate 24 panels. The focus was on the taste, the appearance and the consistency of the chocolate. Also on germs, bacteria and pollutants from the chocolate have been investigated to load in the laboratory. And lo and behold: a brand products are not always the best.
Stiftung Warentest: “good chocolate” convinced
Because in addition to the square Hirschen with Milka, Ritter Sport or Lindt, there are lesser known manufacturers which are in matters of taste even before the chocolate sizes. Of all things, a previously unknown Fairtrade chocolate runs them in the Test of the rank.
“The good chocolate” was able to prevail in the Test against the other 24 bars of chocolate. She was awarded with a grade of 1.9 and was able to convince especially in the taste. One of “the good chocolate” the most delicious chocolate boards in the Test: it smells and tastes very nutty, karamellig and also a little vanilla, say the auditors. Germs or bacteria found in the laboratory.
The Best part: the winner of The large chocolate-Tests of the Stiftung Warentest is the cost per 100g is only a Euro and scores even with a Fairtrade seal of approval and the guarantee to plant per five sold boards to a tree in Mexico. Here you can feast without a guilty Conscience. Plant for the Planet chocolate test winner: The good chocolate
Merci and Milka miss the victory by just
just behind the test winner of the chocolate from Milka and Merci to land. You have cut off grade of 2.0. The reasons: you are either in the taste or in the case of the laboratory investigation on the germ of something behind the first-placed.
Other well-known brands such as Ritter Sport Sarotti, are just mediocre: The taste test they could not compete with the winner of the test and both contain some of pollutants, explains Oeko-Test. But these are only in very small quantity, so that both chocolate bars with “Good” cut.
Stiftung Warentest: the most Expensive chocolate is the worst
The most expensive chocolate Godiva Milk Chocolate cut with the grade of “sufficient” at worst – and not just because of the price. In the laboratory, it was found that the chocolate is loaded with Nickel. This often happens when the cocoa plant absorbs the metal on the water and the soil. This is for consumers, not harmful to health, the product but some minus points.
you are now informed of this before the shelf when you reach for the chocolate, we recommend you take a look at the great chocolate test of Stiftung Warentest. Is represented your favorite in the “best of” list, or you can experiment the next Time with the chocolate choice?
This article appeared first on CHIP.de
Surf-tip: for More content on the account: the Federal government is planning massive tax cuts starting in 2021
CSU woman’s decomposed AfD-request – then pulls out suddenly, a handkerchief, FOCUS Online/Wochit CSU-woman decomposed AfD-request – then pulls out suddenly, a handkerchief anglers seek fishing: 300-Kilo shark, a missed fishermen a big scare PCP anglers get fishing: 300-pound shark missed fishermen a big scare
